WarsawKraków
Chambers Europe · Legal 500 EMEA · Rzeczpospolita
Tier 1 jurisdiction · Deep playbook

Netherlands.

#1 FDI source (18.8%). Dutch BV and Coöperatie structures historically used for holding layers above Polish operating companies; ATAD 3 substance review now standard.

Jurisdiction · 01
I

Country overview

#1 FDI source (18.8%). Dutch BV and Coöperatie structures historically used for holding layers above Polish operating companies; ATAD 3 substance review now standard.

Jurisdiction · 02
II

Key legal services in demand

Jurisdiction · 03
III

Benelux + France holding stack

Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium and France are the dominant choices for holding-structure layering above a Polish operating company — historically through SOPARFI (LU), Dutch BV or French SAS structures.

Recurring issues: ATAD 3 substance requirements ("shell-entity" test), Pillar 2 Top-Up Tax exposure, DAC 6/7/8 reporting, withholding-tax analysis on intra-group dividends, and the EU FDI Screening Regulation's application to ultimate beneficial owners.

Jurisdiction · 04
IV

Our approach

For matters connecting Poland and Netherlands, we coordinate with trusted local partners — and where the matter falls within our priority partner jurisdictions, we engage lawyers from the partner office directly. The Polish-side partner remains the client's single point of contact throughout. Approach outline is provided within 48 hours of initial engagement.

Coordination with local partners. Counsel introductions in Netherlands are made on a case-by-case basis. We do not maintain exclusive referral arrangements. The selection criterion is fit to the specific matter: regulatory expertise, sector knowledge, transaction size, and (for litigation) seat-court familiarity. Engagement letters always disclose any introducing-counsel fees.

Jurisdiction · 05
V

Related practices

Jurisdiction · 06
?

Frequently asked questions

How quickly do you respond on a Netherlands matter?

Within two business hours during CET working hours, the Polish-side partner reads your message and decides whether the matter requires local Netherlands counsel coordination, network deployment, or sole Polish handling. The first approach outline — scope, timeline, and fee proposal — is sent within 48 hours of initial engagement, with no commitment from your side.

Do you handle Netherlands law directly?

No — and we say so transparently. KORDECKI & Partners is admitted to practise Polish law. For substantive Netherlands legal questions we engage trusted local counsel, either through our partner network (for the seven network jurisdictions) or via curated partner-firm relationships maintained since 2009. The Polish partner remains your single point of contact and coordinates billing, scope and timeline.

What treaty framework governs Netherlands–Poland matters?

The Poland–Netherlands double-tax treaty is in force and shapes the analysis of withholding-tax, permanent establishment and transfer-pricing positions. Investment protection is covered by the intra-EU investor-protection framework. Where the matter involves EU directives (Parent-Subsidiary, Interest-and-Royalties, Anti-Tax-Avoidance), those override or supplement bilateral provisions. We map all three layers in the first written outline.

Describe your cross-border matter — Netherlands

We coordinate with local partners in Netherlands so you work with one team, not two. We outline the approach within 48 hours.